In this episode, we take a different approach than usual- we bring a conversation we were having offline with our friend Brian Dilkes about a paper that tries to define the key variables that predict a ‘successful’ faculty member. We talk about some really important flaws of the paper, how to define “success”, and what impact really means and how one could/should/would measure it.
Brian Dilkes is a geneticist employed as an Associate Professor in the Biochemistry Department at Purdue. He is a member of the Purdue Center For Plant Biology, a center devoted to increasing our understanding of fundamental processes in plants. Brian joined ASPB as a graduate student at the University of Arizona, where he studied with Brian Larkins. He met Liz Haswell as a result of their shared history with first-season Taproot podcast interviewee Luca Comai, and Brian met Ivan Baxter at an ASPB meeting in Seattle.
His career is characterized by a pattern of initially rejecting the advice of his mentors and then waiting to hear himself repeat it. Brian hopes you will have the radical courage to make your data available for reuse.
Planet Dilkes websites:
The paper we are discussing – Prediction of junior faculty success in biomedical research: comparison of metrics and effects of mentoring programs
For those who wish to make the metric the target (DON’T DO IT!!!!):
The Taproot is the podcast that digs beneath the surface to understand how scientific publications in plant biology are created. In each episode, co-hosts Liz Haswell and Ivan Baxter take a paper from the literature and talk about the story behind the science with one of its authors.
Questions, feedback, suggestions? Contact us at email@example.com.